Review: Queenie

Today marked the FINAL WEEK in the lead-up to the Women’s Prize shortlist announcement! It was also my birthday, which was very low-key, relaxing, and Women’s Prize focused this year, thanks to this whole lockdown thing. Any day full of books is a good day though, so before I turn in I’m here to talk about another title from the longlist: Candice Carty-Williams’s Queenie.

queenieIn the novel, Queenie is a young woman of Jamaican descent living in London. Her boyfriend of three years has just requested a “break,” so Queenie is temporarily moving out of their shared apartment. At the same time, she’s received some shocking news from her gynecologist that she’s keeping to herself. Amid this upheaval, while the boyfriend refuses to answer her calls or texts, Queenie begins having meaningless sex with men who treat her like trash, which also contributes to trouble at work and with her friends. Everything seems to fall apart at once, and the constant casual (and not so casual) racism Queenie faces drags her down to an all-time low. Can she pick up the pieces?

“I just wanted my old life back. I wanted my boyfriend, and I wanted to not be fucking up at work, I wanted to feel good about myself. I was so far from that, so far from being who I was, but I couldn’t seem to stop myself from self-destructing.”

Queenie is a pacey read driven by compelling first-person narration and packed with modern day-to-day dramas. It’s essentially a coming-of-age story; Queenie is in her mid-twenties just trying to figure life out, in a way that’s very relatable as a fellow mid-twenties woman who’s not entirely sure where her life is heading. Though Queenie’s quest for “normalcy” and a happy ending may be familiar, she is also a very specific character with plenty to share about the female Jamaican British experience. Or at least, one example of it. This aspect I could not relate to, though the level of detail with which things are explained suggests that the book was written with a much wider audience than Jamaican British women in mind, and I did close the book feeling as though I’d gained a bit of perspective.

Queenie as a character is easy to love, despite her questionable choices. It’s clear she’s a good person, a mostly positive, optimistic person, even though she’s hit a rough patch and lost her stride. She reaches out. She tries. She doesn’t apologize for who she is or try to become someone she’s not. She’s not great at explaining or even examining her feelings, so it’s possible some readers will feel disconnected from her, though I think her emotions are usually clear enough through her actions, and it does serve the plot for her to untangle her feelings later on. Carty-Williams has crafted a complex, dynamic character in Queenie, and I enjoyed reading from her perspective.

Point of view aside, the writing is plain but adequate; I found myself marking passages for their quotability rather than because I found the style inspiring or noteworthy. Despite the excellent characterization in Queenie, the rest of the book’s cast is rather one-dimensional. There is not a lot of technical skill on display; this is clearly a contemporary book rather than a literary one, by which I mean the words are well-chosen and serve their purpose, but achieve nothing beneath the story’s surface or through the structure of the narration.

Both plot and commentary are transparent. There’s no nuance to Queenie’s choices in the course of this story, no doubt for either her or the reader that she’s making bad choices because the things she won’t talk about are bothering her at a very deep level. These unaddressed things will, of course, be revealed throughout the course of the novel, and it is not difficult to guess what they will turn out the be- the narration has a tendency to conspicuously skip over details that will later become important, leaving a gaping hole where that information should be, a telltale question mark left dangling as the story moves on until it’s ready to address these gaps. Even the commentary on racism is obvious; someone says something laughably ignorant, another character explains why it is Bad. Even lingo is dissected in-text, whole Urban Dictionary entries appearing in dialogue/text messages. There’s no chance of missing anything, though this also means there’s little need to look deeper than the blunt top layer of text. It’s all right there up front.

” ‘All that Black Lives Matter nonsense,’ scoffed an older man I recognized from the review supplement. ‘All lives matter. […] What about the lives of Latinos, of Asians, the lives of- I’m white, does my life not matter?’ he continued. / ‘I’m not…suggesting that the lives of other ethnic groups do not matter,’ I explained, gobsmacked that I had to explain. ‘I don’t think that any part of Black Lives Matter even hints that other lives are disposable?’ / ‘Well, when you put the lives of some and not all on a pedestal, what else are you doing?’ / ‘It’s not putting black lives on a pedestal, I don’t even know what that means,’ I said, my heart beating fast. ‘It’s saying that black lives, at this point, and historically, do not, and have not mattered, and that they should!’ “

Black Lives Matter is, of course, an important topic, as are the other examples of racism and defense against it that appear throughout the book, but I can’t help but feel lectured when these are laid out so blatantly (as in the example above), which is not a preferable reading experience. It pulls the reader out of the fiction layer of the story, rather than working together with it (at least it does for me). I’m certainly no expert on racism or intersectional feminism, both of which I think Queenie is attempting to address, but my personal taste tends toward subtlety over bluntness; I certainly think there’s an audience for this book and I don’t hesitate to recommend it despite the lukewarm temperature of this review, but because of its blunt-edged approach it just wasn’t a perfect fit for me.

Lastly, it wouldn’t be fitting of the 2020 Women’s Prize longlist if we didn’t acknowledge that this is also- to no one’s surprise- a book about motherhood. This becomes apparent through Queenie’s relationship with her mother, her grandmother, her aunt, and her own thoughts on pregnancy. All of these mother figures have their own particular commendations and flaws, as Carty-Williams- like the rest of this year’s longlist authors- unpick the question of what a “good” mother looks like.

“Do you think I sleep, with all of you to worry about? I don’t think I’ve put my head on the pillow and slept a full night since 1950.”

All in all, a solid offering that I am glad to have read and don’t mind seeing on this year’s longlist, though I wasn’t quite as impressed as I’d hoped to be. I’ve saved some of my highest-hopes titles for last, so the competition is getting to be somewhat fiercer at this point. (Finally!) I’ll have at least one more positive review coming before the end of the week!

My reaction: 3 out of 5 stars. I’m undecided between a 3 and 4 actually, this might change by the time my longlist wrap-up comes up next week. Though the book didn’t do quite as much as I’d hoped it would, I did still have a good time reading it and expect I’ll remember it fondly. I wouldn’t count out reading more of Carty-Wiliams at this point, and I wouldn’t be broken-hearted to see this one make the shortlist, though I think there are stronger contenders I’ll root for ahead of this one.

Have you read Queenie? What did you think?


The Literary Elephant

19 thoughts on “Review: Queenie”

  1. Great review! I’m currently reading this one and feeling very similarly. I like Queenie and the points the books is making, but it definitely favours telling over showing, which is making it all feel a bit heavy handed.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! That was exactly my impression. I’m glad you’re liking it at least somewhat, and will look forward to your final thoughts! πŸ™‚

      Liked by 1 person

  2. The faults you saw in this book when a character says something racist and then it is explained to them why they are wrong — definitely irritating — is why you should read Such a Fun Age. It’s quite a tricksy book that doesn’t do what you think it will. Plus, I loved the audio version, so if you want to list to a book while you’re rounding up those barn kitties, it would be a great choice!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s great to hear! I’ll definitely pick up Such a Fun Age when I can, I was thinking while reading Queenie that I might like that one better, based on what you’ve said about it!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Great review! I read Queenie over the summer, and really enjoyed it, but I was surprised to see it on the longlist because it seems more contemporary than literary, like you said. I’ll probably try to re-read Queenie soon in the context of the WP longlist.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! I did have a good time reading it, though I wasn’t as impressed as I’d hoped to be. It seems the judges usually like to include a contemporary or two for a little variety on the longlist, but it is hard to compare a book like Queenie with, say, Girl Woman Other. I’m happy to have read it, though I know which one of those two I’d prefer to see on the shortlist…
      I’d be curious to see what you think of Queenie with a reread!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I’m glad you enjoyed it! And I agree – it’s definitely hard to compare a contemporary book like Queenie to something like Girl, Woman, Other (which has actually been my favorite read from the WP longlist so far!).

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Belated happy birthday! πŸ₯³ I’m glad you had a low-key relaxing time! Personally birthday parties are a bit of a nightmare for me, so I always prefer small gatherings and then treating myself to a book and my favorite restaurants afterwards.

    I completely agree about the writing as “plain but adequate”; I also found myself highlighting for quotability rather than the beauty of the passages (as opposed to GWO or Fleishman). I also prefer subtlety over being “told” what I’m supposed to think about an issue, so the social commentary aspect of the novel didn’t sit so well with me either. There’s something about Queenie that also feels vaguely YA, but a little older – something with the relentless ‘wokeness’ of it, maybe, or the insistence on slang and text messaging throughout the novel. This is not to diss YA, because I’m sure there are some very good YA books, but it just makes me unsure as to whether this qualifies as literary, too. Great review!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks so much! πŸ™‚ I also usually prefer low-key celebrations, so didn’t mind much. Staying home completely was a bit more extreme than I usually go for, but it’ll be nice to have an extra excuse to do a bit of book browsing and go to a fun restaurant (favorite birthday habits of mine also!) when this is all over.

      It sounds like we’re very much in agreement on Queenie! I think the fact that it seems like a coming of age story is part of what makes it skew away from feeling more adult, that and the lack of subtlety do seem to point toward accessibility/appeal for a younger audience. Queenie is 25/26 but could easily be even 5 years younger without much changing in the novel.

      This is another longlister that I’ve marked down as a contemporary in my own records rather than literary. There actually aren’t very many on this longlist that I’ve marked as literary, I’m just realizing. That’s unusual!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Man, I do feel for all my friends having birthdays during the quarantine. I hope you get to treat yourself properly when this lifts!

        I agree with the 5 years younger comment! Although I have to say, I have seen coming-of-age novels done with a lot more finesse. I remember reading Eugenides’ Middlesex, which was part coming-of-age and part family saga, and I remember loving it a lot.

        You know, it’s only now that I’m coming to realize that I can mark a book as not ‘literary’ even when it’s listed for a prize. I’ve always used to blindly assume that just because it’s listed, it’s automatically literary. Doing this with a community has certainly made me question what literary is all over again, though in a good way. 😁

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Ooh, I haven’t read Middlesex yet but it is on my TBR and I have high hopes for enjoying it! I’m glad to see you found it so successful! I really should pick up a copy.

        And I agree! Prizes definitely make me think about genre classification and what sort of literature is held up for celebration as well. It does leave me wondering also why genre fiction doesn’t often appear on Prize lists, especially with one like this where they seem to be highlighting a lot of contemporary, which is (to my reading taste at least) one of the least exciting categories! πŸ˜…

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s